To stick to the truth and to let more and more FUDed people know the truth, it can not be avoided to uncover those tricks. But remember, just uncover them to show the truth, do not impose any of our thoughts upon people. Yes, it’s hard to do decently. But when there is a will, there is a way. Here the author is right in a way. “If we want to promote free software — and it’s associated ideals – to new users then we should promote it on its merits, without twisting facts and by giving them a chance to get it wrong occasionally.” And meanwhile, as Stallman said, “stick to the truth”, “accept the limitations of existing free software, and/or change them by writing or supporting development of further free software.”
In mind, I am a strong supporter of Free Software, no doubt. But concerning the fight against FUD, I prefer the way of Taiji – conquering the unyielding with the yielding. Thus I invent the DUF (previously FUD when I commented on the article).
- D – Decision (This talks about choice. You are the decision-maker for a choice)
- U – Unclosure (This term is coined to emphasize the concept of “Open Source”. If one does want to know what’s inside, I’d like to show him the OSD by OSI.)
- F – Freedom (This does specify what’s the meaning of `Free’ in “Free Software”, and If one does want to know what `Freedoms’ he can win, I’d like to show him the FSD by FSF, in particular, the four essential freedoms.)
OK, it’s time for us, if we really fight FUD with FUD recent years (according to the author of the article), agree or not, to stop fighting FUD with FUD, but continue to fight FUD with DUF!